Example using “Bayesian” assumptions

Share This Post

135-8234

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions in proving a new design is X% better.
Suppose my current part is producing failures in the field with a Weibull β=2, η=95 hours.
I have demonstrated that I can reproduce the failure mode in the lab by producing the same β.
I have redesigned the part and placed 8 of the new designed parts on test in the same lab setup.
After a few weeks they have test times of 210, 260, 570, 120, 225, 280 500 and 400 hours with no failures.
How much better is this new part?
One way to demonstrate this is to calculate the MLE η of the 8 times demonstrated on the new designed parts, “assuming” a β=2 and “assuming” 1 failure is imminent:
Therefore, showing you have (conservatively) over 10X better reliability

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions
Previously published in the June 2013 Volume 4, Issue 2 ASQ Reliability Division Newsletter

Picture © B. Poncelet https://bennyponcelet.wordpress.com

More To Explore

General

Get Your ASQ Reliability Engineer CRE education at RAMS

A new benefit is being offered to attendees at no additional cost to registration! An additional track has been added that will be dedicated to delivering ASQ Certified Reliability Engineer (CRE) Preparatory Training in sessions aligned with the same times of the regular RAMS sessions for paper presentations and tutorials. The sessions will be broken

General

The 69th Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium

What You Can Look Forward to at RAMS 2023:  The RAMS Program Committee has lined up an outstanding program for you that will feature: — 32 paper sessions from industry professionals, leading researchers, and students;  — 4 panel sessions featuring industry and government leaders; — 22 tutorials supporting in-depth learning.  RAMS 2023 offers a unique combination

Scroll to Top