Example using “Bayesian” assumptions

Share This Post

135-8234

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions in proving a new design is X% better.
Suppose my current part is producing failures in the field with a Weibull β=2, η=95 hours.
I have demonstrated that I can reproduce the failure mode in the lab by producing the same β.
I have redesigned the part and placed 8 of the new designed parts on test in the same lab setup.
After a few weeks they have test times of 210, 260, 570, 120, 225, 280 500 and 400 hours with no failures.
How much better is this new part?
One way to demonstrate this is to calculate the MLE η of the 8 times demonstrated on the new designed parts, “assuming” a β=2 and “assuming” 1 failure is imminent:
Therefore, showing you have (conservatively) over 10X better reliability

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions
Previously published in the June 2013 Volume 4, Issue 2 ASQ Reliability Division Newsletter

Picture © B. Poncelet https://bennyponcelet.wordpress.com

More To Explore

General

ASQ RRD Webinar: RMMR Conference preview

ASQ RRD Webinar: RMMR Conference previewThursday, Jun 30 2022 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM (UTC-04:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) This session is intended to share some of the highlights of the august 2022 RMMR conference to be held in Hartford CT on August 2nd and 3rd. This will include interaction with the audience to

David Auda
General

A note from the RMMR conference Chair

I would like to take this opportunity to invite/welcome you to the annual RMMR 2022 conference. It has been a couple of years of disruptions and as a result of those disruptions many things have changed. Most notably the transition from face to face meetings to remote meetings. It is a safe assumption that our

Scroll to Top