Example using “Bayesian” assumptions

Share This Post

135-8234

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions in proving a new design is X% better.
Suppose my current part is producing failures in the field with a Weibull β=2, η=95 hours.
I have demonstrated that I can reproduce the failure mode in the lab by producing the same β.
I have redesigned the part and placed 8 of the new designed parts on test in the same lab setup.
After a few weeks they have test times of 210, 260, 570, 120, 225, 280 500 and 400 hours with no failures.
How much better is this new part?
One way to demonstrate this is to calculate the MLE η of the 8 times demonstrated on the new designed parts, “assuming” a β=2 and “assuming” 1 failure is imminent:
Therefore, showing you have (conservatively) over 10X better reliability

Example using “Bayesian” assumptions
Previously published in the June 2013 Volume 4, Issue 2 ASQ Reliability Division Newsletter

Picture © B. Poncelet https://bennyponcelet.wordpress.com

More To Explore

General

Ellis R. Ott Scholarship for Applied Statistics and Quality Management

Ellis R. Ott Scholarships Supporting Graduate Students in Applied Statistics and Quality ManagementIn honor of Dr. Ellis R. Ott, late professor at Rutgers University and a founder of ASQ, the Ellis R. Ott Scholarship program awards two scholarships annually of $7500 to graduate students enrolled in or accepted to a master’s or doctoral program in

General

RMMR 2024 – July 25-26, 2024, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – call for abstracts

July 25-26, 2024, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Callfor Abstracts   R&MRisk Management in Real-World Environments   We invite you to submit abstracts for the presentations at the 4th Annual Reliability,Maintenance & Managing Risk Conference (RMMR 2024) to be held on July 25-26,2024 (with pre-conference courses to be offered on July 24), in Pittsburgh, PA.RMMR 2024 is sponsored

Scroll to Top